Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Cost and weight comparison between an all-aluminium monoblock (J.III type) unit and an existing cast iron 20/25 unit.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 10\5\  05-page017
Date  14th May 1938 guessed
  
658 Hives 10LL

COMPARISON ALL ALUM. MONOBLOCK (J.III TYPE) UNIT WITH EXISTING 20/25 UNIT.

Sp. {Mr Spinney} Gr. {George Ratcliffe} Cast Iron 2.81 times that of Al.

Cast Iron.
Wt. of cylinder block. 62.5
Wt. of cylinder head. 73
Total weight C.I. @ 1d/lb. 135.5
Total cost of cast iron 11/3.

Aluminium.
Wt. of cylinder block. 22.2
Wt. of cylinder head. 26
Total wt. of aluminium @ 1/4 per/lb. 48
Total cost of Al. 64/-.

Liners basically cannot be much more expensive than the cylinder bores they replace, otherwise how could the Wolsey Hornet fit them

Rm. {William Robotham - Chief Engineer}
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙