Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Failure of a silencer cutout design for the Goshawk 11 engine and proposing a new attempt.


Identifier  WestWitteringFiles\I\October1922\  Scan19
Date  9th October 1922
  
R.R. 235 A (100 T) (S.F. 216 6-S-19) G. {Mr Griffiths - Chief Accountant / Mr Gnapp} 2480

ORIGINAL,

To HS. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} from R. {Sir Henry Royce}

R6/M9.10.22.

GOSHAWK(Aero Engine)(Codename for 20HP Car / Aero Engine after Kestrel(Aero Engine)) 11. SILENCER & CUTOUT. X4269

I am sorry that our attempt at the cutout is a failure.

I do not want to revert to the scheme we adopted in the 40/50 for many reasons, so that we shall probably try again.

I had thought that a butterfly valve could be embodied more easily than the valve we had fitted but I am not sure that it can be made close enough for second direct outlet.

Evidently it is necessary to have a second opening in addition to the fishtail or more area at the fish-tail. Will you try a second fishtail always in use with present silencer to see if a wider one could always be in use?

R. {Sir Henry Royce}

RECEIVED
stamp: Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} OCT 11 1922
stamp: Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} OCT 11
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙