Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Vehicle electrical systems, earthing, and the use of fuses in battery and distribution circuits.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 61\2\  scan0345
Date  6th August 1920
  
R.R. 285A (100 T) (S.G. 648, 19-2-20) G.{Mr Griffiths - Chief Accountant / Mr Gnapp} 2618

Contd. -2- EFC3/T6.8.20.

earthed as before. We do not know whether this was your impress-
ion, but we had not made the heavy motor circuit dependent upon
the frame in any way. All we have done is to earthe the light
current connection direct from the negative pole of the battery
in accordance with LeC.1125.

There seems to us to be an objection to having
a fuse in the battery circuit at all, as, supposing this has
gone and the dynmo be run with some of the lights switched on,
there is danger, of these lamps being burnt out by the over-
voltage when using a dynamo with inherent control. A field
fuse prevents the dynamo from damage in such a case, but the
probability is that the filament of the lamps would be fused
before the field fuse had time to go.

There appear in this another argument in favour
of the vibrator regulator control system, in which case a battery
fuse no doubt should be used with its attendant advantages.

There seems to be a general feeling here against
the use of the single distributing fuse, whivh, if it goes, puts
out all the lights and puts out of operation the Klaxon, Ignition,
and Starter Motor actuation, and possibly more important than all,
the supply to the inspection lamp plug socket. it appears to
us that either no fuse, or more than one fuse, should be used
on the distribution circuit.

EFC.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙